Positions through contextualising 2


Workflow

Last week, inspired by the phrase “color is the language of the laser cutter” in Moodle, I created a font named Talk to a Laser Cutter, which can be directly recognized by the laser cutter, offering two styles: Cutting and Engraving.

I try to summarize last week’s practice and pose an inquiry:

Based on the framework, Input – Technology – Output, I dissected the two basic elements, text and color, from Week 1’s experiment, and planned to experiment separately in the second and third weeks with:

  • W2: Input: Text – Technology – Output: Text
  • W3: Input: Color – Technology – Output: Color

Week 2’s Work

Every time I open the Glyphs workspace, the 26 letters are neatly arranged. Such an order implies a subtle question: Why does the letter A have to stay at the position of A? In this interface, technology gives me the right to disrupt this order.

Based on cryptography, I attempted to manipulate language through technology. Using Trajan as the model, I created the font, Caesar Cipher. This historically famous cipher is encrypted by shifting each letter of the alphabet by a fixed number. Now, A becomes D, B becomes E. So easily, technology shifts the language.

Original interface
Interface of the font Caesar Cipher
The principle of the Caesar cipher
Remake the table of contents for Murder on the Orient Express
Remake the content for Murder on the Orient Express

CaesarCipher-ShiftRight3.otf

Reference Updates

4 practices or projects:

  1. Pairs, Helmut Smits
  2. Making Then Meaning, Ben Denzer
  3. Bit Flower, Baku Maeda
  4. Pie Chart Pyramid, Anonymous
Pairs, Helmut Smits
Making Then Meaning, Ben Denzer
Bit Flower, Baku Maeda
Pie Chart Pyramid, Anonymous